TEORI CONTIGUOUS CONDITIONING EDWIN RAY GUTHRIE DAN PENERAPANNYA DALAM PEMBELAJARAN PAI DI SEKOLAH
Abstract
This article aims to describe the contiguous conditioning theory and its application in Islamic religious education in schools. Contiguous conditioning theory has the meaning of the closeness of conditions that occur based on the relationship between the stimulus and the relevant response. The method used in this research is literature study where the author tries to find, compile and analyze various information through various related sources. The results of this study explain that learning is a process of change that occurs due to conditions which then cause a reaction (response). Some aspects that cannot be separated from this theory are forgetting, punishment, encouragement, intention, and transfer training. Edwin Ray Guthrie came up with three methods that can be used to change habitual behavior, namely the Threshold Method, the Fatigue Method, and the Incompatible Response Method. These three methods can be used by Islamic Education teachers in implementing their learning in the classroom. The positive contribution of this article informs that the contiguous conditioning theory is very suitable to be applied to develop students' abilities both from the cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains. One way for this theory to work optimally is that the teacher must use interesting learning methods or strategies.
Downloads
References
Aeni Rufaedah, Evi. 2017. Teori Belajar Behavioristik Menurut Perspktif Islam, Risalah, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam. Volume 4, Nomor 1.
Baharuddin & Esa Nur Wahyuni. 2007. Teori Belajar & Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Edy, Sarwo & Sri Uchtiawati. 2017. Teori Belajar. Gresik: UMG Press.
Mulyasa. 2008. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
El Rais. 2012. Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Esti Wuryani Djiwandono, Sri. 2002. Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
FuadAh. Zakki, Jauharoti Alfin, and NasihAhmad Munjin. 2017. “Membangun Etika Dan Kepribadian Di Lembaga Pendidikan Islam: Sebuah Perspektif Psikologi Qur’ani”. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education Studies) 5 (2), 309-38. https://doi.org/10.15642/jpai.2017.5.2.309-338.
Harjanto. 2008. Perencanaan Pengajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Khairani, Makmun. 2013. Psikologi Belajar. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Presindo.
March, David S., Micheal A. Olson, and Russell H. Fazio. 2019. “The Implicit Misattribution Model of Evaluative Conditioning”. Social Psychological Bulletin 13 (3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.5964/spb.v13i3.27574.
Mark K Smith, dkk. 2009. Teori Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Mirza Media Pustaka.
Pendidikan Profesi Guru. 2015. Modul Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Purwokerto: IAIN Purwokerto.
Rachmawati, Tutik & Daryanto. 2015. Teori Belajar dan Proses Pembelajaran Yang Mendidik. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Gava Media.
R. Hergenhahn & Matthew H. Olson. 2017. Teori Belajar, Terj. Triwibowo B.S. Jakarta: Kencana.
Siri Dangnga, Muhammad & Andi Abd. Muis. 2015. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran Inovatif. Makassar: Sibuku.
Suprijono, Agus. 2011. Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi Paikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
W.S. Wingkel. 1989. Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT Gamedia.
Yuberti. 2014. Teori Pembelajaran dan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Dalam Pendidikan. Lampung: Anugrah Utama Raharja.
Copyright (c) 2019 Ghulamul Mustofa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.